Here We Go Again! Rick Koerber's Confidentiality is Violated-- By A Sitting US ATTORNEY, Stewart Young

THE AUDIO IS NOW LIVE..AGAIN

URGENT UPDATE:

BECAUSE OF THIS STORY AND THE AUDIO ASSOCIATED WITH THE COMMENTS OF ATTORNEY STEWART M. YOUNG AT BYU IN UTAH, HE HAS BEEN FORMALLY REMOVED FROM THE RICK KOERBER CASE IN UTAH USA

THERE IS GOING TO BE A BIG LAWSUIT HERE AND JUST THINK, YOUR LOCAL MEDIA IS DOING ALL IT CAN TO SUPPRESS THIS INFORMATION ALONG WITH BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY..... JUST FOLLOW THE FACTS, THE COMMENTS AND THE MONEY. WONDER WHAT RICK KOERBER HAS TO SAY ABOUT THIS. WE WILL POST MORE INFORMATION AS IT BECOMES AVAILABLE.

DISCLAIMER- ALL DATA THAT IS RELEASED IS FOR MEDIA RELATED PURPOSES AND IS BEING DONE SO WITH THAT INTENT.
Notice:
We have just received a digital audio document from a source that shows just how desperate the United States Government is to convict Rick Koerber and Franklin Squires.  We will present to you a full media release of the full backstory and the the complete conversation by and between third parties to the Koerber Case by one of the CURRENT PROSECUTORS, Stewart Young of Utah.

Stand by my friends, because this tape is going to blow you away.  We thank our sources in advance for having the foresight to record this documentation of prosecutorial abuse.  Its amazing that they could not trust ABC, NBC or CBS.... There is a reason for that.

This will be posted on CNN IReport.


Robert Paisola
CEO
Western Capital Multimedia USA
www.RobertPaisola.com 

THE AUDIO, STORY AND CONTENTS ARE THE PROPERTY OF WESTERN CAPITAL MULTIMEDIA AND PORTIONS OF THE AUDIO ARE THE PROPERTY OF BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY  legal@robertpaisola.com

THE AUDIO FROM AUSA STEWART YOUNG (DOWNLOAD THIS NOW)

http://tinyurl.com/StewartYoungAtBYUServer13


IF YOU ARE INTERESTED IN EDUCATIONAL FAIR USE JUSTICE, DOWNLOAD THIS NOW AND EMAIL US THE LINK AROUND THE WORLD.

COMMENT:  5-23-13 Miami
This file has now been collocated on 16 servers around the world. We are posting this as an EDUCATIONAL EXCEPTION TO THE COPYRIGHT. IF ANY ATTEMPT IS MADE TO PULL THIS DOWN AGAIN, WE WILL PROVIDE YOU WITH THE ENTIRE BACKSTORY OF WHERE IT CAME FROM.

COMMENT:  5-21-13 Los Angeles

This is how bad that they do not want you to hear this tape:  We will never quit!

Hello robertpaisola,

Kiwi6 has been notified in accordance with the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) that some of your materials allegedly infringe upon the copyrights of others (sender email: urquiagal@law.byu.edu). The URLs of the allegedly infringing materials may be found at the end of this message. The DMCA is a United States copyright law that provides guidelines for online service provider liability in case of copyright infringement.

We are in the process of removing from our servers the files that allegedly infringe upon copyrights. If we did not do so, we would be subject to a claim of copyright infringement, regardless of its merits. If you feel that your files were mistakenly removed due to a DMCA request filed against you, Kiwi6 can reinstate these materials upon receipt of a DMCA Counter Notification form to support@kiwi6.com. If you have legal questions about this notification, you should speak with your own legal counsel. The affected URLs are listed below:

Comments of AUSA Stewart Young UTAH to BYU - http://kiwi6.com/file/32xunbjwk8

The Kiwi6 Team

THE ISSUE

On April 18, 2013 Federal Judge Clark Waddoups chastised the government in open court for its repeated misconduct in bringing the case against Utah businessman Rick Koerber.  During that hearing the Judge stated:

"You're still saying you didn't say mother may I.  I want you to go behind that and tell me why that makes one bit of sense under our system and our constitution."  

Further, the Judge repeated, "the government's position doesn't make any sense."  

In retaliation, Assistant United States Attorney Stewart Young recently told a BYU law class that the government's un-constitutional misconduct was acceptable because Koerber, "is a scumbag" and "Judges in our district...are not very hard on white-collar criminals [like Koerber] because they believe that th[ey] are just poor misunderstood Mormon bishops who, just happened to take $100 million."  

Further, AUSA Young lectured the law school students that "Rick Koerber "ran a ponzi-scheme" without disclosing that the case is still pending, the government has been found repeatedly guilty of illicit and unlawful conduct, and that prosecutors have admitted to the judge that they have changed their argument and now don't intend argue that Koerber actually had "any" victims, but instead that if his business continued he might have had victims and thus he should be found guilty.  Young also revealed apparently unsubstantiated government theories regarding Koerber's use of trust funds and financial advisers - none of which have ever been mentioned in the charges Koerber now faces.

Evidently, prosecutors are sore over Judge Waddoups throwing out illicit evidence obtained and used by government prosecutors to secure the original indictment and the fact that he has since begun dismissing additional charges in the now pending 3rd indictment.   Young is also critical in his remarks of the FBI and praises the IRS - apparently a reference to FBI Agent Cameron Saxey and IRS Agent Ron Marker's performance in the Koerber case.  Evidently, the FBI has been less than willing to prosecute Koerber for political reasons.  IRS Agent Marker is the only witness the government could find to testify before the Federal Grand Jury that returned the last indictment of Koerber.  

Finally, during his presentation to the law students, AUSA Young also admits that the federal government has been "bootstrapping" allegations to bring Koerber to trial rather than relying on actual facts and allegations of direct wrong-doing.  

Legal experts consulted by Western Capital suggest that all of Young's comments may also be prosecutor misconduct in direct violation of the Utah Rules of Professional Conduct Rule 3.6(a) and 3.8 which reads:  

"A lawyer who is participating or has participated in the investigation or litigation of a matter shall not make [] extrajudicial statement..."

It remains to be seen how Judge Waddoups will react to AUSA Young's vocal contempt and misconduct before law students at Brigham Young University.  Especially in light of the government's pattern of criticism of his decisions.  For example, former US Attorney Tolman's statement to the press that Waddopus has been "inappropriately light" in sentencing certain defendants, such as Susan Russ.  The United States's Attorneys Office has also been critical of Judge Waddoups regarding the Sister Wive's lawsuit, the State / Federal land disputes, and his "astounding" criticism of the federal government and the FBI in an OKC bombing case.  

See recording at:  48:17; 48:42; 57:34; 1:12:36; 1:13:08;  

THE AUDIO FILE LINK
http://tinyurl.com/StewartYoungAtBYUServer13

AUTHORIZATION TO POST:
FAIR USE:

One of the rights accorded to the owner of copyright is the right to reproduce or to authorize others to reproduce the work in copies or phonorecords. This right is subject to certain limitations found in sections 107 through 118 of the copyright law (title 17, U. S. Code). One of the more important limitations is the doctrine of “fair use.” The doctrine of fair use has developed through a substantial number of court decisions over the years and has been codified in section 107 of the copyright law.

Section 107 contains a list of the various purposes for which the reproduction of a particular work may be considered fair, such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Section 107 also sets out four factors to be considered in determining whether or not a particular use is fair.

1. The purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes
2. The nature of the copyrighted work
3. The amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole
4. The effect of the use upon the potential market for, or value of, the copyrighted work

The distinction between what is fair use and what is infringement in a particular case will not always be clear or easily defined. There is no specific number of words, lines, or notes that may safely be taken without permission. Acknowledging the source of the copyrighted material does not substitute for obtaining permission.

The 1961 Report of the Register of Copyrights on the General Revision of the U.S. Copyright Law cites examples of activities that courts have regarded as fair use: “quotation of excerpts in a review or criticism for purposes of illustration or comment; quotation of short passages in a scholarly or technical work, for illustration or clarification of the author’s observations; use in a parody of some of the content of the work parodied; summary of an address or article, with brief quotations, in a news report; reproduction by a library of a portion of a work to replace part of a damaged copy; reproduction by a teacher or student of a small part of a work to illustrate a lesson; reproduction of a work in legislative or judicial proceedings or reports; incidental and fortuitous reproduction, in a newsreel or broadcast, of a work located in the scene of an event being reported.”

Copyright protects the particular way authors have expressed themselves. It does not extend to any ideas, systems, or factual information conveyed in a work.

The safest course is to get permission from the copyright owner before using copyrighted material. The Copyright Office cannot give this permission.

When it is impracticable to obtain permission, you should consider avoiding the use of copyrighted material unless you are confident that the doctrine of fair use would apply to the situation. The Copyright Office can neither determine whether a particular use may be considered fair nor advise on possible copyright violations. If there is any doubt, it is advisable to consult an attorney.

FL-102, Reviewed June 2012

THIS SPEECH WAS GIVEN AT A UNIVERSITY IN THE UNITED STATES FOR EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY.